May 19, 2013
Industrial Revolution era Stoke-on-Trent master potters ruled the world.
Their unimaginably ingenious capacity for organization and innovation was matched only by their obsessively competitive blood-lust. The potteries that operated within the six towns of Stoke-on-Trent were preeminent suppliers of up-to-the-minute pottery fashion to the entire world. Silicon Valley meets Madison Avenue. About the only thing Henry Ford added to the picture over a century later was additional mechanization. In such a relatively small community as Stoke, one can imagine the subterfuge and turf battles.
On the other hand, no single factory was large enough to possibly handle the orders that rolled in. As such, everybody did piece work for everybody else. Shopping out orders while keeping innovations close to the chest must have been quite a delicate dance.
Yes, they were a colorful bunch.
But just so we’re clear about the topic, see the image below. This old post card photo of one of Stoke’s pottery towns was taken decades after their dominance had waned.
Imagine this scene 50 years earlier.

Readings:
Master potters of the Industrial Revolution: the Turners of Lane End. Bevis Hillier. Cory, Adams, & McKay/London. 1965.
The Rise of the Staffordshire Potteries. John Thomas. Augustus Kelly Publishers/New York. 1971.
Tags: child labor, Henry Ford, Industrial Revolution, potteries, Silicon Valley, Stoke-on-Trent
Posted in ceramic history, English Pottery, Industrial Revolution, Pottery and Economics, pottery history, Stoke-on-Trent | 1 Comment »
May 5, 2013
There was a conversation between two 19th century redware potters that never actually happened. Their little ‘chat’ was just a letter to a friend and a newspaper ad written in two different states several decades apart.
Norman Judd worked in Rome, NY starting in 1814. Rome was a frontier boom town at the time, catering to fortune seekers on their way to the Western Reserve (preset day Ohio). In such a place people cared only about cheap, instant access to the necessities of life. Anyone willing to mass produce tableware could make a quick buck. Bennington trained Judd was just the guy for the job. He described his life to a friend:
“We make Earthenware fast – have burned 8 kilns since the 8th of last May – amtg to $1500 – Ware here is ready cash. It is now 8 o’clock at night, I have just done turning bowls – I rest across my mould bench while writing – no wonder if I do make wild shots…”
James Grier faced a very different situation. When he started his Mount Jordan Pottery in Oxford, PA in 1828, the competition was fierce and growing fiercer. Grier, and his son Ralph who took over the shop in 1837, followed the (by then) common path of advertising their talents in local newspapers to set themselves apart from the crowd. Most 19th century pottery ad language tended to the ‘best there ever was’ sort of hyperbole. But Ralph Grier took a slightly different tack. An 1868 notice in the “Oxford Press” read:
“EARTHENWARE of all kinds of the very best quality. No poor ware ‘cracked up’ and foisted upon the public.”
What potter has not at one time or another teetered into the depths of the chasm exposed between these two sentiments?
Readings
American Redware. William Ketchum Jr. Holt & Co./Ney York. 1991.
Tags: Bennington, James Grier, Mount Jordan Pottery, Norman Judd, Ralph Grier, Redware, Western Reserve
Posted in ceramic history, Early American ceramics, Early American Pottery, James Grier, Norman Judd, North America, pottery, Pottery and Economics, pottery prices, Ralph Grier, redware pottery | 2 Comments »
April 21, 2013
Dirk Claesen was good. So good the captain of the Graef, sailing Claesen to New Amsterdam from Leeuwerden Holland in 1654, wrote him a letter of introduction. Claesen was an “extraordinary potter” who “resolves to fix his abode upon the island of Manhattan or Long Island, then you procure him a convenient situation for his settlement and to establish a pottery as he remains satisfied.”
Dirk Claesen truly was good. He soon married and bought property. His “potbaker’s corner” plot was the city’s redware production focal point for the next 150 years. In 1657 Dirk became the first of only four “pottmakers” to receive New Amsterdam Burgher Rights. His pottery skills served him well.
But things went bad. Dirk remarried twice. Legal problems hounded him and his three wives. In 1655 Wife #1 sued a man for hitting her. She sued another for stealing her canoe. Dirk sued Andries Hoppen to pay for pots Hoppen ordered.
In 1660 Wife #1 was sued to pay for wine and beaver pelts she ordered (losing despite Dirk’s plea that he “knows nothing better than that is all paid and sent plaintiff.”). Wife #2 was sued when her hogs rooted in a neighbor’s garden. Dirk was sued to take back Wife #1, “the aforesaid woman suffers great want and lies on straw without bed or bedding… and has the ague.” (She died, ending the case.)
In 1665 Dirk sued Anthony Dirkzen for taking salary as an employee then running off “to fight indians.” In 1670 Dirk sued to get paid for a brick carrying job. In 1673 Wife #2 was sued to pay for two beaver pelts.
In 1675 Dirk and Wife #3 were sued by children of Wives 1 and 2 for some property. Dirk was sued for cutting William Phillips’s nose so badly “that it hung down over his lipps; which is contrary to law and the Peace of our Sovereign Lord the King, etc.” Apparently, his daughter “had by her impudence enticed William Phillips to come into bed to her, where her father, the potbaker, finding them, caused the disturbance. The act being found to be evil, she was committed to the sheriff’s custody.”
What’s missing in this messy tale is any description of Dirk Claesen’s pottery. He was, after all, “extraordinary” at it. The moral of the story? Pots come and pots go, but your rap sheet lasts forever.
Reading:
Early Potters and Potteries of New York State. William Ketchum. Funk & Wagnalls/New York. 1970.
Tags: Burgher Rights, Dirk Claesen, law suits, New Amsterdam, Redware
Posted in ceramic history, Dirk Claesen, Early American ceramics, New Amsterdam, North America, pottery history, redware pottery | 2 Comments »
April 7, 2013
Why did men used to need a dowry bribe to marry? Fortunately, these enlightened days offer men an alternative prenuptial pageant. And women get bridal showers, so goods are still exchanged.
In the early 19th century a working class bride might instead expect to receive an “outset,” a collection of useful items given by her parents on occasion of her marriage. People needed many things to start up a household. Silverware. Bedding. Furniture. And pottery. Especially inexpensive redware slip trailed with moralistic adages.
Chamber pots were a common gift. Various kinds of dishes were another. These were occasions when the parent (or the potter) could have some fun. “When this you see remember me…” Or offer words of advice. “Give drink to the thirsty.” Or instruct in proper living. “Visit the sick.” Sgraffito potters also got in on the act with whole sentences scrawled around plate rims. “Eating is for existence and life, drinking is also good besides.” Words to live by.
But one wonders at some sayings trailed onto outset gift plates. Take, for example, the bacon plate shown below. “Hard times in Jersey.” The two most likely makers of this plate were either Henry Van Saun who ran a “Pottery Bake Shoppe” near New Milford, NJ from 1811 to 1829, or George Wolfkiel who bought the old Van Saun shop in 1847 and ran it until 1867. Wolfkiel is believed to have made a set of dishes for the wedding of a certain Mrs. Zabriskie in nearby Ramsey. It’s possible that this plate was part of her outset.
You can see this bacon plate today at the Wadsworth Atheneum in Hartford CT. But what was the message to young Mrs. Zabriskie on the occasion? Good luck? Oh well? Told you so?

Readings:
The Reshaping of Everyday Life. John Worrel. Harper Perennial/New York. 1989.
Kitchen Ceramics. Selsin, Rozensztroch, and Cliff. Abbeville Press/New York. 1997.
Tags: bacon plate, bridal shower, Chamber pots, dowery, George Wolfkiel, Henry Van Saun, pie plates, Redware, Slipware, stag party, Wadsworth Atheneum
Posted in bacon plate, ceramic history, Early American ceramics, Early American Pottery, Earthenware, folk pottery, George Wolfkiel, Henry Van Saun, North America, pie plate, pottery history, redware pottery, sgraffito, Slipware, Wadsworth Atheneum | 3 Comments »
March 24, 2013
Everybody loves an underdog, as the saying goes. But whenever a rural occupation confronts an industrial revolution, doom results.
In this regard, early American redware potters were singularly marked. They might marry the tavern keeper’s daughter (lots of business was transacted in taverns) or open a dry goods store (another reliable outlet) to avoid their fate. Some switched to stoneware. Some quit altogether.
Others found salvation in flowerpots.
Abraham Hews of Weston MA wasn’t thinking this when he opened a redware shop in 1765. He relied on ‘word-of-mouth’ sales within walking distance of Weston instead of the huge nearby Boston market. Still, probate records at his death put him solidly in the middle income bracket. In fact his was to be one of the few redware potteries to remain active, from father to son, until 1871.
Abraham Hews II had big plans for the shop. He actually listed himself in tax roles as “potter” (Abraham I only ever called himself “yeoman”). Things went well, even though Abraham II phased out extraneous slip decoration after 1800 like most New England redware potters would.
But the writing was on the wall by the 1860′s. The Hews family began the switch to flowerpots, both molded and hand made, to stay alive. They relocated next to clay pits shared by North Cambridge MA brick makers in 1871.
The Panic of 1893 erased North Cambridge’s brick industry, leaving all that clay to A.C. Hews & Co. So perhaps it’s no surprise that at the dawn of the 20th century Hews could boast an output of over 20 million flowerpots. More than anyone. Anywhere. Ever.
Plastics finally slew the Hews clay flowerpot business in the 1960′s. One family’s 200 year involvement in clay ended. It might date me, but it’s a personal thrill to think that one small slice of redware pottery history saw it’s closing chapter in my own lifetime.
It’s nice to feel connected.
Readings:
Domestic Pottery of the Northeastern United States, 1625-1850. Sarah Peabody Turnbaugh, Ed. Academic Press/New York. 1985.
Early New England Potters and Their Wares. Lura Woodside Watkins. Harvard Univ Press/Cambridge MA. 1968.
Domestic Pottery of the Northeastern United States, 1625-1850. Sarah Peabody Turnbaugh, Ed. Academic Press/New York. 1985.
The Reshaping of Everyday Life: 1790-1840. Jack Larkin. Harper Perennial/New York. 1989.
Technorati Tags:
underdogs,
industrial revolution,
redware,
stoneware,
flowerpots,
Abraham Hews I,
Weston MA,
Abraham Hews II,
slipware,
brick makers,
A.C. Hews & Co.,
Panic of 1893
Tags: A.C. Hews & Co., Abraham Hews I, Abraham Hews II, brick makers, flowerpots, Industrial Revolution, Panic of 1893, Redware, Slipware, Stoneware, underdogs, Weston MA
Posted in Abraham Hews, AC Hews & Co, brick making, ceramic history, Early American ceramics, Early American Pottery, Earthenware, flowerpots, Industrial Revolution, New England, North America, Panic of 1893, Pottery and Economics, pottery history, redware pottery, Slipware, Stoneware, Weston, MA | 2 Comments »
March 10, 2013
Raise your hand if you can name all the presidents. And if memorizing them made you sleep through every history class from then on?
The uses to which we put history determines it’s shelf life. This adage is blatantly visible in English transfer print export pottery to America (ie; show me the money). Take the first five presidents: Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, and Monroe (of course). Their shelf life varied.
Everybody loved George Washington (president from 1789-1797). Shelves full of English export ware commemorated his administration. Perhaps that’s to be expected of any revolution’s central “founding father.”
There is practically no English export ware commemorating John Adams (1797-1801). Maybe Adams was just too dour for the English. But he’d have to be pretty dour to trump the English love of commerce.
Things got somewhat back to normal with Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809). Even if many of his likenesses were really just “clip art” portraits with his name pasted under them. No matter, as long as the name sold.
James Madison (1809-1817) held his own, though he declared a fairly pointless war against England in 1812. But by then English pottery firms knew the extent of the American market and were prepared to go the distance in catering to popular demand.
Which brings us to James Monroe (1817-1825). He too had his day. But presidential portrait pottery had begun it’s decline. Not so much because of the Monroe Doctrine, but because English firms were catching on to what American potters already knew. Politics as decoration can be a hard sell. Practically no American pottery company bothered with political imagery until the election of 1840. Landscapes, flowers, and famous places were partisan neutral.
The irony is that Monroe’s Democratic-Republican party had wiped out the opposition Federalists. George Washington’s original ideal of a ‘party-less’ government was within reach.
The country was still wracked by economic crises, but the opposition party had imploded from it’s own colossal intransigence and a major war was over. People called the time “The Era Of Good Feelings.” Yes, people once actually spoke like that about American national politics.
To those who warn that we risk repeating the past, I say “I wish.”
Readings:
American Patriotic and Political China. Marian Klamkin. Scribner’s and Sons/New York. 1973.
China-Trade Porcelain. John Goldsmith Phillips. Harvard University Press/Cambridge, MA. 1956.
Technorati Tags:
American Presidents,
English Transfer Print pottery,
Washington,
Adams,
Jefferson,
Madison,
Monroe,
clip art,
War of 1812,
Monroe Doctrine,
Democratic-Republican Party,
Federalist Party,
The Era Of Good Feelings,
election of 1840
Tags: Adams, American Presidents, clip art, Democratic-Republican Party, election of 1840, English Transfer Print pottery, Federalist Party, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, Monroe Doctrine, The Era Of Good Feelings, War of 1812, Washington
Posted in Creamware, English Pottery, North America, Pottery and Economics, pottery and politics, pottery history, Transfer Print Ceramics | 1 Comment »
February 24, 2013
Everything about 18th century English Agateware was odd. Maybe curious is a better word. Production, sales, and public interest rose and fell in tandem with lulls between other ideas and fashions. That is, agateware was so bizarre that people took note. Until something else came along…
Of course, “agateware” (sometimes called “scroddled” ware in the US) refers to swirled layers of colored clays mimicking agate-like surfaces. There were, are, two kinds. Thrown (on a wheel) and laid (molded).
John Dwight made the first recorded thrown agateware in the 1670′s. Dwight’s Fulham shop was an innovation hotspot but he didn’t make much agate. When Thomas Whieldon began, in the 1740′s, staining white clays instead of combining different clays of different color breakage dropped and production rose. By the 1750′s Stoke-on-Trent potters were laying pre-mixed agate strips into molds giving more finely striated surfaces. Production and sales jumped further, but continued to fluctuate until mass produced English porcelain nailed the coffin lid in the 1780′s.
Current opinion regarding this temperamental pottery’s inspiration points to T’ang Dynasty China; European excavators (robbers) of T’ang funeral sites brought (smuggled) examples of T’ang agateware back to the curiosity cabinets of European gentlemen collectors (fences).
Potters by then could (and did) copy anything these gentlemen might show them. Laid agate from 1750 onwards certainly looked technically similar to T’ang work. This was the era of cheap European knock-offs of up-scale Chinese products. But China was weakening. European missionaries and other no-account foreign devils freely roamed the countryside, digging up whatever they chose.
Dwight’s thrown agate happened much earlier, however, when controls were not so porous. Even if T’ang relics were smuggled out then, Dwight was still “just” a potter – industrial pottery magnates were a couple generations away. Could he have been that close to the Gentleman collector strata of society? Or did Dwight rather see humble marbled pilgrim costrels from France or Italy and, in pondering those, he stumbled upon agate layered clays?
Or maybe he thought it up all by himself. Of course, the idea that an old potter could think something up all by himself, when someone on the other side of the planet did it 900 years earlier, is ridiculous. Where would be the fun in that?
Readings:
Ceramics in America, 2003. Robert Hunter, Ed. University Press of New England/Hanover, NH. 2003.
If These Pots Could Talk. Ivor Noel Hume. University Press of New England/Hanover, NH. 2001.
China-Trade Porcelain. John Phillips Goldsmith. Harvard University Press/Cambridge, MA. 1956.
Tags: Agateware, Fulham, John Dwight, Stoke-on-Trent, T’ang Dynasty, Thomas Whieldon
Posted in Agate Ware, ceramic archeology, Costrel, John Dwight, Porcelain, Pottery and Economics, pottery and politics, pottery history, T'ang Dynasty, Thomas Whieldon | Leave a Comment »
February 2, 2013
Those who say punctuation is everything really mean context is everything. For example, “Woman, without her man, is nothing.” Or is it “Woman: Without her, man is nothing.” Hmmm.
This game has been played for centuries. Josiah Wedgwood once wrote in a letter to his partner Thomas Bentley “we can sell nothing too good to America.”
The American market had grown exponentially since independence. English pottery firms amassed huge fortunes from the insatiable American cash cow. And Wedgwood, with his “almost American love for the extension of business” was one of the first to the trough.
Of course when he made that comment he meant the American market was so huge, so demanding, that his firm had to aspire to the heights of quality to stand out from the crowd. Wedgwood learned how to create a buzz through years of marketing experience at home. He pandered to American nouveau riche with high-end goods which the middle classes could only drool at. Furthermore, there was enough money in America to sustain even these inflated price points. How else could he survive in such a competitive market…
Of course when he made that comment he meant the American market was so huge, so profitable, that his firm could get away with selling anything scraped off the shop floor. Wedgwood pioneered the concept of unloading merchandise whose sole virtue was a rock bottom price tag (“seconds”) to America. Even these showed a tidy profit. So why bother with sending anything better…
Of course.
Readings:
If These Pots Could Talk. Ivor Noël Hume. University Press of New England/Hanover, NH. 2001.
The Rise of the Staffordshire Potteries. John Thomas. Augustus Kelly Publishers/New York. 1971.
Staffordshire Pottery and Its History. Josiah Wedgwood. McBride Nast & Co./New York & London. 1913.
Tags: Bentley, punctuation, Wedgwood
Posted in English Pottery, Josiah Wedgwood, North America, Pottery and Economics, pottery history, pottery prices, Seconds, Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent | 1 Comment »
January 20, 2013
Nobody messed with Johannes Neesz and got away with it. Or maybe he just had a peculiar sense of humor. Once upon a time a minister invited Johannes to lunch to discuss an order of dishes the minister wanted, adorned with pious sayings. Johannes arrived promptly but was kept waiting for 2 hours. One of the plates finally delivered read, “I have never been in a place where people eat their dinner so late. Anno in the year 1812.”
Enigmas, or inside jokes, defined late 18th – early 19th century Bucks and Montgomery County PA Germanic “tulip wares.” Flowers, people and animals that no sane person could ever tire of looking at were paired with commentary (maybe or maybe not arcanely reflecting religious sentiments) around the rim. A plate with a beautiful peacock surrounded by vined flowers by Georg Hübener (active 1785 – 1798) read, “Surely no hawk will seize this bird because the tulips bend over it. The kraut is well pickled but badly greased, Master Cook.” Other oddities included “I am very much afraid my naughty daughter will get no man” (Henry Roudebuth, 1813). “Early in the morning I fry a sausage in sour gravy” (Michael Scholl, c.1811). “To consume everything in gluttony and intemperance before my end makes a just testament” (Jacob Scholl).
German emigration beginning in the 1680′s brought a well developed sgraffito style with copper green highlights (unlike English counterparts) to the area. But the late 18th century uniquely American development of the fruit pie caused an explosion in decorated dishes. Dishes by Johannes Neesz (sometimes spelled Nase, or Nesz, as on his 1867 gravestone) stood out. He experimented with black backgrounds for his sgraffito. He combined sgraffito with colored slips.
More importantly, he carried sgraffito beyond just pie plates and onto all sorts of thrown works, from tea sets to pickle jars, shaving basins, and more. Others previously had dallied with this. Others since would go further. But Johannes purposefully pushed the boundaries of what was possible in tulip ware.
That last point is a godsend for modern redware potters. It’s how we justify our ‘interpretive drift’ of splashing sgraffito on just about anything. Because of Johannes, we can substitute “historically accurate” for “this is what I prefer to do.”
Johannes Neesz might respond with another popular sgraffito adage, “Out of earth with understanding the potter makes everything.”
Readings:
Tulip Ware of the Pennsylvania-German Potters. Edward Atlee Barber. Dover Publications/New York. 1926.
Lead Glazed Pottery. Edwin Atlee Barber. Museum of Philadelphia/Philadelphia. 1907.
Tags: fruit pie, Georg Hübener, Henry Roudebuth, Jacob Scholl, Johannes Neesz, Michael Scholl, sgraffito, tulip wares
Posted in Barnstable, Bidford, Bucks County, ceramic history, Early American ceramics, Early American Pottery, Earthenware, English Pottery, folk pottery, Food, Georg Hubener, Germany, Johannes Neesz, pie plate, pottery, Pottery and Religion, Pottery Decoration, redware pottery, sgraffito, tulip ware | 3 Comments »
January 6, 2013
(Adventures in Community Development)
In early 1994 Valentin Lopez made his first, and probably only, trip to the United States. His voyage from his home in San Juan de Oriente, Nicaragua (sponsored by Potters for Peace) was part educational effort for Americans to learn about Nicaragua, part fund raiser for PFP, and part marketing opportunity for Valentin. Valentin is an incredibly talented traditional Pre-Columbian Maya style potter. He can eloquently describe his work, his inspirations, and his community. He is also very much what Nicaraguans call an “indio;” very Mayan in appearance, with little Spanish influence.
I was asked to show Valentin around when some free time opened up in his schedule. Maybe get him into a classroom. Maybe introduce him to a collector.
We visited the wealthy collector first. He owned a walk-through history of Pre-Columbian pottery; Aztec to Maya; Inca to Oaxaca. Mind boggling. But the jerk didn’t buy anything. Was Valentin’s work not “real” enough? As we drove away, I wondered what Valentin thought of the encounter.
The only teacher I knew then worked in a kindergarten. So off we went to visit a bunch of 6 year olds. (Great trip so far, Steve!) We immediately noticed that the classroom was divided. “Anglo” kids sat up front. Hispanic kids in the back. The teachers seemed resigned to riding shotgun around the Hispanic kids, one girl in particular, to keep them focused on the day’s activities.
The girl giggled when I began translating. She knew what Valentin was saying better than I did. We let her translate. The change was electric. Suddenly Spanish was a benefit, not a stigma. This ‘problem kid’ was now a valued leader, showing others the way.
I had brought some coloring books on Pre-Columbian pottery designs PFP made for an education project in Nicaragua where books of any kind were scarce. The kids dove into the books after the presentation. It was the most productive day the teachers had seen.
I think of that girl. Where is she now? Did that day impart any notion that her abilities were strengths? Did she grow up to be a potter? Will she be the first Hispanic female President? Or maybe, reflecting on the worlds of potters and presidential campaigns, she just grew up to be a decent person. That’s my hope.
Reading:
Dibujos de las Tatara Tatarabuelas. Ron Rivera and Barbara Donachy. Ceramistas Por La Paz/Managua, Nicaragua. 1993.
Technorati Tags:
Valentin Lopez,
San Juan de Oriente,
Nicaragua,
Potters for Peace,
Pre Columbian Ceramics,
Inca,
Aztec,
Maya,
Oaxaca,
translation,
Spanish,
Community Development
Tags: Aztec, Community Development, Inca, Maya, Nicaragua, Oaxaca, Potters for Peace, Pre Columbian Ceramics, San Juan de Oriente, Spanish, translation, Valentin Lopez
Posted in Central America, Community Development, Nicaragua, Potters for Peace, Pre Columbian, Valentin Lopez | 1 Comment »